Re: PGP or GPG public key?

Shaw Terwilliger (sterwill@postman.sourcegear.com)
Sun, 31 Oct 1999 13:30:42 -0600

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: David G. Watson: "Small problem with GTK version"
Previous message: Frederik Cheeseman: "PGP or GPG public key?"
In reply to: Frederik Cheeseman: "PGP or GPG public key?"

Frederik Cheeseman wrote:
> Just wondering if there is any gpg or pgp public key around for your rpm
> distributions?

Right now I'm the "release maintainer" of sorts, and I do have a GPG
public key, but the packages aren't signed with it (unless RPM is doing
it without my knowledge). Could you log this as a bug in Bugzilla
(www.abisource.com/bugzilla)?

-- 
Shaw Terwilliger

Next message: David G. Watson: "Small problem with GTK version"
Previous message: Frederik Cheeseman: "PGP or GPG public key?"
In reply to: Frederik Cheeseman: "PGP or GPG public key?"

This archive was generated by hypermail 1.03b2.