Re: FW: Spell dialog.

Subject: Re: FW: Spell dialog.
From: Tim LaDuca (mail@timl.org)
Date: Tue Aug 01 2000 - 22:47:12 CDT

• sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: Martin Sevior: "Re: Spell dialog. (fwd)"
• Previous message: Bruce Pearson: "FW: Spell dialog."
• In reply to: Bruce Pearson: "FW: Spell dialog."
• Next in thread: WJCarpenter: "Re: Spell dialog."
• Reply: Tim LaDuca: "Re: FW: Spell dialog."
• Reply: WJCarpenter: "Re: Spell dialog."

Bruce Pearson wrote:
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce Pearson [mailto:BruceP@wn.com.au]
> Sent: Wednesday, 02 August, 2000 11:30
> To: Martin Sevior
> Subject: Spell dialog.
>
> Martin,
>
> Please explain WHY you would want the Spell dialog modeless.
>
>

Well, I can think of a reason. Say while you're doing a spell check you
see that you really muffed something up that requires the combining two
words, or other sorts of re-arranging. With a modeless speller you could
correct it without stopping the spellcheck. However I don't think the
dialog should be allowed to sink.

-- 
/******************************
 * Tim LaDuca  mail@timl.org  *
 *             www.timl.org   *
 ******************************/

• Next message: Martin Sevior: "Re: Spell dialog. (fwd)"
• Previous message: Bruce Pearson: "FW: Spell dialog."
• In reply to: Bruce Pearson: "FW: Spell dialog."
• Next in thread: WJCarpenter: "Re: Spell dialog."
• Reply: Tim LaDuca: "Re: FW: Spell dialog."
• Reply: WJCarpenter: "Re: Spell dialog."

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Tue Aug 01 2000 - 22:46:54 CDT