ANSI standards

Subject: ANSI standards
From: sam th (sam@bur-jud-118-039.rh.uchicago.edu)
Date: Thu Jan 20 2000 - 04:26:20 CST

• sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: Henrik Berg: "SV: ANSI standards"
• Previous message: sam th: "Re: #include ap_EditMethods.cpp"
• Next in thread: Henrik Berg: "SV: ANSI standards"
• Reply: Henrik Berg: "SV: ANSI standards"
• Reply: Thomas Fletcher: "Re: ANSI standards"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

According to bug 238, several string manipulation functions that we use
are not ansi standard. I did some checking, and here are the platforms on
which we use the functions in question:

strdup
BEOS Unix QNX

stricmp, strnicmp
Win32 QNX

strcasecmp, strncasecmp
BEOS

Are these really not ansi standard? the compiler on linux is set to give
every warning possible, and it doesn't complain about strdup. What about
the other platforms? Does this need to be fixed?
By the way, this was in my ZAPing of the Release Practicies POW.
           
                                     sam th
                                     sytobinh@uchicago.edu
                                        
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE4huLNt+kM0Mq9M/wRAkq2AKDeLYkzF2aYV24xUOv3w3Auh9oS8ACdFmfD
94jlN7rzS5zZJrEuKdZYGc8=
=4r8L
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

• Next message: Henrik Berg: "SV: ANSI standards"
• Previous message: sam th: "Re: #include ap_EditMethods.cpp"
• Next in thread: Henrik Berg: "SV: ANSI standards"
• Reply: Henrik Berg: "SV: ANSI standards"
• Reply: Thomas Fletcher: "Re: ANSI standards"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Thu Jan 20 2000 - 04:26:22 CST