Subject: [Fwd: Re: patch -- LaTeX exporter, and new --to command line option]
From: Joaquin Cuenca Abela (cuenca@ie2.u-psud.fr)
Date: Wed Jan 26 2000 - 11:05:21 CST
Ops, I've forget the abiword list :)
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: patch -- LaTeX exporter, and new --to command line option
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2000 18:04:16 +0100
From: Joaquin Cuenca Abela <cuenca@ie2.u-psud.fr>
To: Hubert Figuiere <hfiguiere@teaser.fr>
References: <Pine.BSD.3.91.1000125151203.20078A-100000@qnx.com>
<388EDD94.AFE3FC61@ie2.u-psud.fr> <20000126101934.B9883@abisource.com>
<20000126174405.E1789@rhodan.businessobjects.com>
Hubert Figuiere wrote:
>
> According to sterwill@abisource.com <sterwill@abisource.com>:
>
> > Having not looked at the code to implement this, is the process XP-clean
> > enough to fit nicely in such an wp/ap/xp/ap_Convert.cpp? It seems to
> > me like the process would have very clean entry points (give it the source
> > file, the target file(s), and the output format(s), and let it do all the
> > doc loading/converting/saving magic), so that this could be easily
> > implemented with a few lines of code in each platform.
>
> I haven't had a look at this, but I think that allowing it to run without
> being able to open the X display (for the UN*X version) is IMHO a
> requirement. So we can use it as a batch processing tool.
It's exactly like I've implemented it.
But if you don't specify the --nosplash option, the splash screen
appears. Do you think that it will be good to make the actual "--to" =
"--nosplash --to"? (My personal answer is YES :)
-- Joaquín Cuenca Abela e-mail: cuenca@ie2.u-psud.fr
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Wed Jan 26 2000 - 11:07:03 CST