Re: Scripting

Subject: Re: Scripting
From: Randy Kramer (rhkramer@fast.net)
Date: Sun Jun 25 2000 - 10:39:37 CDT

• sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: sam th: "Re: Scripting"
• Previous message: Mike Meyer: "Re: Scripting"
• In reply to: Mike Meyer: "Re: Scripting"
• Next in thread: sam th: "Re: Scripting"
• Next in thread: Paul Cubbage: "Re: Scripting"
• Reply: Randy Kramer: "Re: Scripting"
• Reply: sam th: "Re: Scripting"

Mike,

Thanks for your response to my other post. No need to respond to this.
For me, the quoted paragraph below answers all my questions. (Even if
it is not all implemented immediately.)

Aside: Scheme a descendant of Algol? Wow! Someday I'll have to dig
into how they support that. ;-)

Randy Kramer

Mike Meyer wrote:

> But in my mind, that list can be simply described as "anything the
> user can do sitting at the keyboard". Otherwise, you've failed the
> "completeness" criteria of that paper.
>
> <mike

• Next message: sam th: "Re: Scripting"
• Previous message: Mike Meyer: "Re: Scripting"
• In reply to: Mike Meyer: "Re: Scripting"
• Next in thread: sam th: "Re: Scripting"
• Next in thread: Paul Cubbage: "Re: Scripting"
• Reply: Randy Kramer: "Re: Scripting"
• Reply: sam th: "Re: Scripting"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Sun Jun 25 2000 - 10:38:12 CDT