Subject: Re: POW 19.12.99
From: sam th (sam@bur-jud-118-039.rh.uchicago.edu)
Date: Fri May 19 2000 - 08:17:42 CDT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 19 May 2000, Mike Nordell wrote:
> Martin Sevior wrote:
>
> > 2. I get a ton of
> >
> > Assert ****
> > FP_RUN_NOT != containsOffset(iOffset) at fp_Run.cpp:1222
> > ****
> > **** (71) Continue ? (y/n) [y] :
> >
> > After inserting a page or column break. I believe this is Mike's work.
>
> Credit where credit is due, but on this occation it's not. I can't take
> the credit for the assert that triggers. But, it seems like it _has_ to
> assert, and maybe even crash-and-burn, since there's no way that function
> can return legal values for x & y since the 'iOffset' argument isn't
> within 'this' run (this is what the assert says).
> I think...
Yeah, I looked at CVS and it says that it was Eric's fault. However, that
function (and several nearby) are interesting in that they have as their
first line
UT_ASSERT(UT_SHOULD_NOT_HAPPEN);
which suggests that we shouldn't call them ( :-) or should remove some of
the asserts.
sam th
sam@uchicago.edu
http://sam.rh.uchicago.edu
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE5JT73t+kM0Mq9M/wRAj9KAJ97PB+X+vLu4paKOzd+yS71A5jMcQCeP/kX
jlTDhN7fQyAm1M4Qp7wt1C8=
=VJlX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Fri May 19 2000 - 08:17:37 CDT