Re: Spurious assert?

Subject: Re: Spurious assert?
From: Sam TH (sam@uchicago.edu)
Date: Sat Nov 11 2000 - 09:07:48 CST

• sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: Chih-Wei Huang: "Re: [Fwd]: Re: final bits for CJK patch"
• Previous message: Sam TH: "Re: #384 TopRuler scrolling"
• In reply to: Mike Nordell: "Spurious assert?"
• Next in thread: Martin Sevior: "Re: Spurious assert?"
• Reply: Sam TH: "Re: Spurious assert?"
• Reply: Martin Sevior: "Re: Spurious assert?"

On Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 03:43:15PM +0100, Mike Nordell wrote:
> pf_Frag_Object constructor asserts
>
> UT_ASSERT(pszType);
>
> Is this really correct? An image don't have a "type". To reproduce, try
> opening test/wp/suite/image_height_width.abw

Yeah, that assert seems bogus. It can go.

           
        sam th
        sam@uchicago.edu
        http://www.abisource.com/~sam/
        GnuPG Key:
        http://www.abisource.com/~sam/key

• application/pgp-signature attachment: stored

• Next message: Chih-Wei Huang: "Re: [Fwd]: Re: final bits for CJK patch"
• Previous message: Sam TH: "Re: #384 TopRuler scrolling"
• In reply to: Mike Nordell: "Spurious assert?"
• Next in thread: Martin Sevior: "Re: Spurious assert?"
• Reply: Sam TH: "Re: Spurious assert?"
• Reply: Martin Sevior: "Re: Spurious assert?"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Sat Nov 11 2000 - 09:07:50 CST