Re: Spurious assert?

Subject: Re: Spurious assert?
From: Martin Sevior (msevior@mccubbin.ph.unimelb.edu.au)
Date: Sat Nov 11 2000 - 14:52:35 CST

• sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: Mike Nordell: "Uninitialized data (or here we go again)"
• Previous message: Dom Lachowicz: "Commit: Word Import Fix"
• In reply to: Sam TH: "Re: Spurious assert?"
• Next in thread: Mike Nordell: "Re: Spurious assert?"
• Reply: Martin Sevior: "Re: Spurious assert?"
• Reply: Mike Nordell: "Re: Spurious assert?"
• Reply: Thomas Fletcher: "ANOTHER Spurious assert?"

On Sat, 11 Nov 2000, Sam TH wrote:

> On Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 03:43:15PM +0100, Mike Nordell wrote:
> > pf_Frag_Object constructor asserts
> >
> > UT_ASSERT(pszType);
> >
> > Is this really correct? An image don't have a "type". To reproduce, try
> > opening test/wp/suite/image_height_width.abw
>
> Yeah, that assert seems bogus. It can go.
>
It was probabally left over from debugging the piecetable fields patch.
Feel free to remove it.

Martin

• Next message: Mike Nordell: "Uninitialized data (or here we go again)"
• Previous message: Dom Lachowicz: "Commit: Word Import Fix"
• In reply to: Sam TH: "Re: Spurious assert?"
• Next in thread: Mike Nordell: "Re: Spurious assert?"
• Reply: Martin Sevior: "Re: Spurious assert?"
• Reply: Mike Nordell: "Re: Spurious assert?"
• Reply: Thomas Fletcher: "ANOTHER Spurious assert?"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Sat Nov 11 2000 - 14:52:57 CST