Re: Spurious assert?

Subject: Re: Spurious assert?
From: Mike Nordell (tamlin@algonet.se)
Date: Sat Nov 11 2000 - 15:22:29 CST

• sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: Dom Lachowicz: "Re: Spurious assert?"
• Previous message: Mike Nordell: "Uninitialized data (or here we go again)"
• In reply to: Martin Sevior: "Re: Spurious assert?"
• Next in thread: Thomas Fletcher: "ANOTHER Spurious assert?"
• Next in thread: Dom Lachowicz: "Re: Spurious assert?"
• Reply: Mike Nordell: "Re: Spurious assert?"

Martin Sevior wrote:

[...]
> > > pf_Frag_Object constructor asserts

> It was probabally left over from debugging the piecetable fields patch.
> Feel free to remove it.

I'd love to, but I haven't got a recent CVS tree locally, and I'm too lazy
to update it. :-)

Could anyone please take care of it?

/Mike - please don't cc

• Next message: Dom Lachowicz: "Re: Spurious assert?"
• Previous message: Mike Nordell: "Uninitialized data (or here we go again)"
• In reply to: Martin Sevior: "Re: Spurious assert?"
• Next in thread: Thomas Fletcher: "ANOTHER Spurious assert?"
• Next in thread: Dom Lachowicz: "Re: Spurious assert?"
• Reply: Mike Nordell: "Re: Spurious assert?"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Sat Nov 11 2000 - 15:23:31 CST