Re: Spurious assert?

Subject: Re: Spurious assert?
From: Dom Lachowicz (cinamod@hotmail.com)
Date: Sat Nov 11 2000 - 15:31:37 CST

• sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: Dom Lachowicz: "Re: Uninitialized data (or here we go again)"
• Previous message: Mike Nordell: "Re: Spurious assert?"
• Maybe in reply to: Mike Nordell: "Spurious assert?"
• Maybe reply: Dom Lachowicz: "Re: Spurious assert?"

Already been done :)

Dom

>From: "Mike Nordell" <tamlin@algonet.se>
>To: "AbiWord-dev" <abiword-dev@abisource.com>
>Subject: Re: Spurious assert?
>Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2000 22:22:29 +0100
>
>Martin Sevior wrote:
>
>[...]
> > > > pf_Frag_Object constructor asserts
>
> > It was probabally left over from debugging the piecetable fields patch.
> > Feel free to remove it.
>
>I'd love to, but I haven't got a recent CVS tree locally, and I'm too lazy
>to update it. :-)
>
>Could anyone please take care of it?
>
>/Mike - please don't cc
>
>
>

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.

• Next message: Dom Lachowicz: "Re: Uninitialized data (or here we go again)"
• Previous message: Mike Nordell: "Re: Spurious assert?"
• Maybe in reply to: Mike Nordell: "Spurious assert?"
• Maybe reply: Dom Lachowicz: "Re: Spurious assert?"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Sat Nov 11 2000 - 15:31:40 CST