Subject: Re: Still unbuildable on Windows
From: Sam TH (sam@uchicago.edu)
Date: Fri Apr 13 2001 - 06:51:12 CDT
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 09:22:08PM +1000, Andrew Dunbar wrote:
> Sam TH wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 08:52:31PM +1000, Andrew Dunbar wrote:
> > > All 3 of these functions are declared and define with their first
> > > argument being a const pointer but for some reason the compiler
> > > thinks we are attempting to call members with non-const first
> > > arguments.
> > What happens if you explicitly cast the arguments to (const char *),
> > or whatever?
>
> Hmm the errors result from trying to define these member functions
> and not from trying to call them...
I don't get it. If it is complaining about the declarations, how does
it know we're calling them improperly? I'm really still unclear what
the compiler means with this error message.
sam th --- sam@uchicago.edu --- http://www.abisource.com/~sam/
OpenPGP Key: CABD33FC --- http://samth.dyndns.org/key
DeCSS: http://samth.dyndns.org/decss
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Fri Apr 13 2001 - 06:40:07 CDT