Subject: what do we want into 1.0? (was Re: Linking against libjpeg ?)
From: Joaquin Cuenca Abela (cuenca@celium.net)
Date: Wed Apr 18 2001 - 12:08:36 CDT
On 18 Apr 2001 12:11:31 -0500, Sam TH wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 12:53:39PM -0400, Patrick Lam wrote:
> > On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Thomas Fletcher wrote:
> >
> > > We are waiting for someone to take a compelling first stab at
> > > making these plugins a reality. Things that need to be considered
> >
> > It's unclear to me that plugins are a good idea to try to get in for 1.0.
>
> Given that no one has even started on implementing them, I think we
> should defininitely push them to post 1.0.
>
> And, I would suggest making that a criteria for any new feature - If
> you haven't started now, it won't go in 1.0. Period.
but I think that everybody can easily workaround this policy ("hey! I
started a week ago! it was just in my hd...")
:-)
Cheers,
-- Joaquín Cuenca Abela cuenca@celium.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Wed Apr 18 2001 - 12:09:49 CDT