Subject: Re: refactoring AP_*Frame (was Re: NO consensus!)
From: Hubert Figuiere (hfiguiere@teaser.fr)
Date: Thu Apr 26 2001 - 03:09:34 CDT
According to Paul Rohr <paul@abisource.com>:
>
> I'm curious. If it's "just" a bunch of cut-and-paste code, why would we
> need to break the tree to get it refactored? In theory, it should be safe
> to replace the N duplicate references with the relevant XP call, no?
>
Just because in those cut & paste code, the only difference comes
from platform object instantiation. For this we need to provide a static
constructor for the xp class that is implemented by the platform class.
So until the platform maintainer implements it, the link will fail.
Hub
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Thu Apr 26 2001 - 03:10:12 CDT