Subject: RE: UT_Bool vs bool
From: Joaquin Cuenca Abela (cuenca@celium.net)
Date: Tue Feb 06 2001 - 06:32:17 CST
Paul wrote:
>
> If the consensus is that people are willing to drop support for
> any crufty
> old compiler that doesn't support bool and friends, then go the whole way
> and purge UT_Bool entirely. There are plenty of script whizzes here who
> could generate the necessary commit.
If nobody disagrees, I will post a patch to get rid of UT_Bool, UT_True &
UT_False tonight.
Cheers,
-- Joaquin Cuenca Abela cuenca@celium.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Tue Feb 06 2001 - 06:31:26 CST