Subject: vote system (was RE: version 1.0)
From: Joaquin Cuenca Abela (cuenca@celium.net)
Date: Tue Feb 06 2001 - 11:58:41 CST
Paul wrote:
>
> At 11:07 AM 2/6/01 -0600, Sam TH wrote:
> >I'm not sure we really need to go all the way with the apache voting
> >system. It's an excellent way to poll people, but I can think of very
> >few instances where we have needed a vote to solve something.
>
> Agreed.
What? dudes, your memory is getting worse with the time :)
I can easily remember the discussion about the -show option... I implemented
it even when I myself & Paul were against the feature (I remember clearly
Paul commenting that this feature was... *ugly*... *it looks like perl*...
and some other stuff), and the only "+1" come from Sam. We should prevent
these errors! :)
I can remember too the discussion about making the LaTeX exporter produce
more accurate output or a simpler stuff. If I remember correctly Sam and
somebody else gave "+1", and myself and somebody else gave "-1" (and anyway
I implemented it!! god, I'm a moron!)
And what about the bool discussion? (this one is the third or fourth
incarnation of this discussion). I can clearly remember how last time Mike
showed that all the supported compilers supported bool (a few months ago)
and nobody expressed a strong virtual "-1", and everybody seemed to express
virtuals "+1" (or at least "+0") but anyway the guidelines were not touched!
What a shame!!
And what about the STL discussion?
Do you want that I continue??? ;-)
I vote +1 to accept the Apache vote style! (god, that's getting
recursive...)
> Paul,
> repentant
Damn, I said that before, Paul, you're a loser ;-)
P.S.: And, in addition, the Apache vote system is cool :)
-- Joaquin Cuenca Abela cuenca@celium.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Tue Feb 06 2001 - 11:57:48 CST