Re: Is there any opposition to a debian/ top-level subdir?

Subject: Re: Is there any opposition to a debian/ top-level subdir?
From: Sam TH (sam@uchicago.edu)
Date: Mon Feb 12 2001 - 02:12:07 CST

• sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: Hubert Figuiere: "Re: XP dialogs"
• Previous message: WJCarpenter: "Re: Mime-types"
• In reply to: Mauro Colorio: "Re: Is there any opposition to a debian/ top-level subdir?"
• Next in thread: Marcello Nuccio: "Re: Is there any opposition to a debian/ top-level subdir?"
• Next in thread: Paul Rohr: "Re: Is there any opposition to a debian/ top-level subdir?"
• Reply: Sam TH: "Re: Is there any opposition to a debian/ top-level subdir?"
• Reply: Marcello Nuccio: "Re: Is there any opposition to a debian/ top-level subdir?"

On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 08:48:29AM +0100, Mauro Colorio wrote:
> > We need this to be a native Debian package. If no one minds, I will
> > add it.
>
>
> Please Compile abiword for potato!
> (not with Xfree 4.x)
>

If you are willing to use the development snapshots, the debian builds
at http://www.abisource.com/~sam/nightly/latest are compiled on potato.
           
        sam th
        sam@uchicago.edu
        http://www.abisource.com/~sam/
        GnuPG Key:
        http://www.abisource.com/~sam/key

• application/pgp-signature attachment: stored

• Next message: Hubert Figuiere: "Re: XP dialogs"
• Previous message: WJCarpenter: "Re: Mime-types"
• In reply to: Mauro Colorio: "Re: Is there any opposition to a debian/ top-level subdir?"
• Next in thread: Marcello Nuccio: "Re: Is there any opposition to a debian/ top-level subdir?"
• Next in thread: Paul Rohr: "Re: Is there any opposition to a debian/ top-level subdir?"
• Reply: Sam TH: "Re: Is there any opposition to a debian/ top-level subdir?"
• Reply: Marcello Nuccio: "Re: Is there any opposition to a debian/ top-level subdir?"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Mon Feb 12 2001 - 02:10:29 CST