Subject: Re: So, when do we get autoconf support on Linux?
From: Jesper Skov (jskov@redhat.com)
Date: Thu Feb 15 2001 - 04:50:25 CST
>>>>> "Sam" == Sam TH <sam@uchicago.edu> writes:
Sam> Sadly, however, that doesn't mean dependencies. All the -Wp fun
Sam> stuff is gcc-specific, and a definite no-no. I just took it out
Sam> of psiconv earlier today.
Of course we can have dependencies where supported. Simply add a
autoconf rule that checks for -Wp support in compiler and add it to
CFLAGS if it does. No sweat.
Jesper
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Thu Feb 15 2001 - 04:50:50 CST