Subject: Re: spelling images and fields (was Re: Commit: fix that spelling + images bug)
jskov@zoftcorp.adsl.dk
Date: Mon Mar 26 2001 - 03:54:55 CST
>>>>> "Tomas" == Tomas Frydrych <tomas@frydrych.uklinux.net> writes:
Tomas> I fail to see the need to spellcheck fields, we are not going
Tomas> to allow spelling errors into the output of our fields, or are
Tomas> we?
>> I didn't say that :) The problem is caused by the fact that Images
>> and Fields are identified as "objects" in the backend.
>>
>> So my suggestion was to translate these to two different unicodes.
>> See 'case pf_Frag::PFT_Object:' in pt_PieceTable::getBlockBuf. That
>> needs to check the sub-types of the PFT_Object and translate
>> accordingly.
Tomas> I am just questioning whether PFT_Object really needs to be
Tomas> treated as anything else than whitespace.
It does - because fields are objects. If they are whitespaces, they
cannot be selected.
Jesper
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Mon Mar 26 2001 - 03:55:18 CST