Subject: ignored words code
From: Patrick Lam (plam@plam.lcs.mit.edu)
Date: Thu May 03 2001 - 12:17:37 CDT
On Thu, 3 May 2001, Hubert Figuiere wrote:
> Actually Dom have added sniffer use to xap_App. Hence the include.
> Dom asked yesterday wether this should go to ap_App or xap_App, and
> we concluded that this belonged to xap_App is import/export is quite
> generic.
Speaking of ap vs. xap, the ignored words code lives in
af/xap/xp/xad_Document. Is there any rational reason that this doesn't
live in the piece table document code instead?
pat
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Sat May 26 2001 - 03:51:01 CDT