Re: when will be 1.0 ?

• Previous message: Hubert Figuiere: "Re: bugfix for bug #1920"
• In reply to: Petr Tomasek: "when will be 1.0 ?"
• Next in thread: Dom Lachowicz: "Re: when will be 1.0 ?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 07:43, Petr Tomasek wrote:
> I've some improvements into the t602 importer pending. Should I try
> to mak them into 1.0 or should I wait for later release. Will there be
> some stable release (relatively) soon after 1.0?

Send the patch, it may get into the tree or it may not, but at least it
will be archived here :)

Hugs

-- 
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Ghandi
+ So let's do it...?

• application/pgp-signature attachment: This is a digitally signed message part

• Next message: Andrew Dunbar: "Re: Bug 1956?"
• Previous message: Hubert Figuiere: "Re: bugfix for bug #1920"
• In reply to: Petr Tomasek: "when will be 1.0 ?"
• Next in thread: Dom Lachowicz: "Re: when will be 1.0 ?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Apr 15 2002 - 07:02:42 EDT