Re: utf-8 vs. utf-32

From: Tomas Frydrych (tomas@frydrych.uklinux.net)
Date: Wed Apr 24 2002 - 07:07:30 EDT

  • Next message: Christian Biesinger: "small compile warning patch"

    > > utf-32 more memory for most people.
    >
    > For *all* people. Almost all characters fit in UTF-16 without
    > using surrogates, and certainly all the most commonly characters
    > do. Surrogates will be very rare.

    I did not know that. In that case, I am not sure we really want to
    abandon the internal 16-bit representation at the moment.

    Tomas

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Apr 24 2002 - 07:13:02 EDT