From: Mike Nordell (tamlin@algonet.se)
Date: Sat Aug 03 2002 - 21:20:45 EDT
Patrick Lam wrote:
> The Win32 code would not be smaller in any meaningful way; we could
> save at most 2k from the binary size or
> something like that.
So what do you consider a size reduction "in any meaningful way" since this
apparently doesn't fit your bill? Do you expect a small and localized patch
that all of a sudden removes 1MB from the AW binary? You have to start
somewhere.
> p.s. I'm not saying that fv_Cursor is a bad thing to do,
IIRC it was you who advicated a Q'n'D hack with a thread, bool and a mutex
for the view class.
Btw, wasn't threads a big no-no, similar to the usage of C++ templates?
> but I'm in favour of solving one problem at a time.
And you think solving the cursor problem is solving many problems, and
that's a problem???
> fv_Caret is a single thing which can be fixed by itself.
And how exacly does the code (with my mentioned modifications/removals) I
displayed not fix it?
/Mike - please don't cc
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Aug 03 2002 - 21:28:05 EDT