Re: Version of the future?

From: Dom Lachowicz (doml@appligent.com)
Date: Tue Aug 27 2002 - 23:32:51 EDT

  • Next message: Andrew Dunbar: "Re: Version of the future?"

    I would very much like to see 1.0.3 be released within one week. The
    1.0.x series should very much live on and continue to be worked on, at
    least in "maintainer-mode."

    While bug 3519 is a very important meta-bug, I believe the bugs it
    lists as blockers are actually blockers for the 1.0.x series actually
    being considered "complete" as opposed to it meaning that 1.0.3 is
    ready for public consumption. Many fixes have gone into STABLE and
    these really need to get out to users ASAP, as is shown by both the
    large number of bugs closed and the considerable user response calling
    for us to release STABLE as an official release. If we move quickly
    enough, we might even get 1.0.3 included in the RH 8.0 release, which
    would be cool.

    FWIW, CVS HEAD will be called "2.0" when it is sufficiently mature and
    not "1.2".

    Cheers,
    Dom

    On Tuesday, August 27, 2002, at 10:22 PM, E . A . Zen wrote:

    > I understand with the recent make issues that it may be difficult to
    > make any absolute guess (and obviously never a commitment) but it
    > would be something to lead with for next week.
    >
    > The question being, will there be an intermittent 1.0.3, or will there
    > be holding out for 1.2/2.0?
    >
    > With nearly weekly commits to HEAD and stable, it does seem a valid
    > question, and it was discussed earlier in reference to unifying the
    > artbase.
    >

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Aug 27 2002 - 23:37:12 EDT