Re: Commit(HEAD) qnx getCoverage func.

From: Christian Biesinger (cbiesinger@web.de)
Date: Wed Jun 19 2002 - 17:23:07 EDT

Next message: phearbear: "Re: Commit(HEAD) qnx getCoverage func."

Previous message: Dom Lachowicz: "Re: Re[4]: Unicode"
In reply to: phearbear: "Commit(HEAD) qnx getCoverage func."
Next in thread: phearbear: "Re: Commit(HEAD) qnx getCoverage func."
Reply: phearbear: "Re: Commit(HEAD) qnx getCoverage func."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Wed, Jun 19, 2002 at 07:39:22PM +0200, phearbear wrote:
> Btw, why isn't Reply-to set in this mailinglist???

It shouldn't...
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html

-- "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin

application/pgp-signature attachment: stored

Next message: phearbear: "Re: Commit(HEAD) qnx getCoverage func."
Previous message: Dom Lachowicz: "Re: Re[4]: Unicode"
In reply to: phearbear: "Commit(HEAD) qnx getCoverage func."
Next in thread: phearbear: "Re: Commit(HEAD) qnx getCoverage func."
Reply: phearbear: "Re: Commit(HEAD) qnx getCoverage func."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jun 19 2002 - 17:26:18 EDT