Re: on why we can't use link, the grammar checker

• Previous message: Rui Miguel Silva Seabra: "on why we can't use link, the grammar checker"
• In reply to: Rui Miguel Silva Seabra: "on why we can't use link, the grammar checker"
• Next in thread: Rui Miguel Silva Seabra: "Re: on why we can't use link, the grammar checker"
• Reply: Rui Miguel Silva Seabra: "Re: on why we can't use link, the grammar checker"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> Our goal should not be the exclusion of link, but convincing the authors
> to at the very least make it so we can work with it.
> Of course what would be the best target would be making it copyleft.

I have already written a letter to the authors of the link grammar, asking
them to consider a dual license which would allow the grammar to be used
under the terms of the GPL.

They have not given me a definite answer, but have said that they're
considering it. I am hopeful.

I will let you know as soon as I hear more from them.

        Jared

-- 
Love all, serve all.

• Next message: Chris Winne: "Re: Close on last doc"
• Previous message: Rui Miguel Silva Seabra: "on why we can't use link, the grammar checker"
• In reply to: Rui Miguel Silva Seabra: "on why we can't use link, the grammar checker"
• Next in thread: Rui Miguel Silva Seabra: "Re: on why we can't use link, the grammar checker"
• Reply: Rui Miguel Silva Seabra: "Re: on why we can't use link, the grammar checker"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Mar 06 2002 - 21:31:20 GMT