From: William Lachance (william.lachance@sympatico.ca)
Date: Tue Nov 26 2002 - 18:56:15 EST
On Fri, 2002-11-22 at 12:22, Hubert Figuiere wrote:
> Almost what I want although I would have name the class "Impl" and not
> "Helper" because it really is the implementation. But never mind. That
> is just being nitpicky.
Sounds like a good change to me. Not sure why I didn't do this
initially, come to think of it. I will do this.
> > The good news: This will ultimately result in less duplicated code (I
> > haven't started placing platform-independant abi frame code into
> > AP_Frame class, I will soon!) and better model-view-controller
> > seperation (it should be somewhat easier to grok the frame code when
> > this is all finished).
>
> YUM. Now the game is to intermix Cocoa Obj-C MVC model with Abi C++ MVC
> model for the Cocoa port. Fun thing.
Are there any particular considerations/requirements for the XP layer
that I should keep in mind?
> > Overall, I think this is a win. I will continue to polish the XP and
> > UNIX code to make it better. I will need help from platform maintainers
> > to bring the Win32/QNX code to this new system.
> >
>
> Perhaps we can close that "early" (aka 3 digits) bug soon :-)
>
> Will, I'm 100% with you and will try to follow the UNIX implementation.
A MacOS X port would be uber-cool. Glad to see we're one step closer to
this goal.
Cheers,
-- William Lachance <william.lachance@sympatico.ca>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Nov 26 2002 - 18:55:39 EST