Re: issue with plugins

From: Mike (mike@redtux.demon.co.uk)
Date: Sat Aug 09 2003 - 21:25:31 EDT

  • Next message: ericzen: "Re: issue with plugins"

    On Sat, 2003-08-09 at 23:23, ericzen wrote:
    > On 2003.08.09 15:15 Mike wrote:
    > >
    > > rebuilt with no --enable-abiword-builtins and plugins showup again - is
    > > this a known issue?
    >
    > "built-in" is an option for systems that can't actually handle plugins. When the correct version of the plugins is available and already built, the built-in option actually builds them into the main binary. This is for the likes and QNX and so forth that won't hand external sub-programme modules, unicies (posix-compliant platforms) should NOT need this.
    >
    > As for plugins (if you followed THEIR build information) make sure they're of the same version as the binary (i.e. if you're using an individual release binaries plugins with your head build--that means, build the plugins from the cvs as well).
    >
    > -Eric

    This probably needs some clarification in the docs.

    IMHO - there should be some sort of warning to the effect that if you
    use the option in *-plugins, something similar should be in the abiword
    binary

    there is an option in abi of --with-builtin-plugins

    trying not to be dense here, but I would see the two options combined as
    being either

    a - a selection of plugins is built into the binary, and others can be
    compiled and called

    b - abi will call extra plugins when required (if compiled and
    installed)

    neither of which is the current effect



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Aug 09 2003 - 21:40:30 EDT