From: Daniel Jensen (jensend@iname.com)
Date: Tue Feb 04 2003 - 09:52:48 EST
Mark Gilbert wrote:
>>BTW, for QA, what's the policy on verifying bugs which are verifiably
>>fixed in head but not in stable? Should such bugs get verified as fixed
>>unless the bug is slated for fixing in stable (is on the "make 1.0.5 not
>>suck" list)?
>
> Change the version field of the bugzilla entry to indicate STABLE cvs
> branch, and make a note that the fix needs to be backported (as a
> comment). Keep the bug open.
I wasn't clear enough, sorry- I mean bugs which are in the RESOLVED
state which I am wondering whether to verify. Should these really be
reopened?
-- Support varied threatened habitats throughout the world: http://www.ecologyfund.com/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Feb 04 2003 - 09:57:00 EST