From: Jordi Mas (jmas@softcatala.org)
Date: Wed Nov 05 2003 - 02:56:01 EST
En/na tomasfrydrych@yahoo.co.uk ha escrit:
> Hi Jordi,
>
>
>>My suggestion is to commit it with regular CR/LF, as all the other files, if
>>you are OK with this.
>
>
> I am most definitely not OK with this. The whole CVS tree must use the
> same eol convention, we cannot use LF in the xp branches and CR/LF
> in win32 branches, it would create a complete havoc; for pragmatic
> reasons this has been and should be LF-only. Unfortunately, time from
> time a win32 developer succeeds in checking in a file with CR/LF eols
> and I gather that is what Jeremy fixed in this case.
>
> The real problem with the MSVC editor is that it is unable to work with
> LF files only: it will honour existing eols, but it will insert CR/LF on each
> new line you add. The result is that you end up with files that are
> neither CR/LF nor LF: you either have to have your CVS client do LF <-
Tomas,
I do not use the MSVC editor. I use UltraEdit. UltraEdit respects files with
CR/LF (Unix) and LF only (DOS/Windows).
I do not have the tree right now, but there is something rare in the file that
Jemery committed. It's not the CR/LF - LF question as already said in my first
message.
Jordi,
--Jordi Mas i Hernāndez (homepage http://www.softcatala.org/~jmas) http://www.softcatala.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Nov 05 2003 - 02:53:49 EST