From: Hubert Figuiere (hfiguiere_at_teaser.fr)
Date: Sun Nov 16 2003 - 18:21:54 EST
According to msevior_at_physics.unimelb.edu.au <msevior_at_physics.unimelb.edu.au>:
> Given that Hub is on the verge getting the OSX port usable, I think it
> makes sense for us to go for a fair bit of publicity on this release.
I never said that soon. I'm now at the stage I actually try to use it
for real work and find to much things to do for it to be really
usable. And the build system still does not a make a fink independant
binary...
So it not for public consumption.
> So the question is, should we aim for a 2.1.0 release this week? I can do
> the release towards the end of the week myself.
>
> Things I'd like to see in 2.1.0..
>
> 1. OSX binaries :-) (If Hub is happy)
No
>
> 1. Slashdot, macslash, mac central,... all the numerous place mac-heads
> hang out. (Maybe I can bribe plam to submit a story for slashdot. I'm 0
> for 3 so far)
If someone post this to any Mac news[1] site, I'll come visit him
personnaly to handle the betrayal. I'm not kidding.
Hub
[1] rumors would probably be more appropriate as even tabloid
journalists are more serious about what news are.
-- AbiWord maintainer - Lille, France http://www.figuiere.net/hub/ GPG fingerprint: 6C44 DB3E 0BF3 EAF5 B433 239A 5FEE 05E6 A56E 15A3
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Nov 16 2003 - 18:21:13 EST