Re: 2.1.0 this week?

From: Marc Maurer (j.m.maurer_at_student.utwente.nl)
Date: Mon Nov 17 2003 - 06:15:20 EST

  • Next message: Rui Miguel Seabra: "Re: [commit] Spanish translation"

    There are some printing fixes in STABLE cvs. Could you try that for us?
    This should definately be fixed in 2.0.2.

    Marc

    Op ma 17-11-2003, om 04:24 schreef Ryan Pavlik:
    > Martin Sevior wrote:
    >
    > >On Mon, 2003-11-17 at 13:31, Ryan Pavlik wrote:
    > >
    > >
    > >>Martin Sevior wrote:
    > >>
    > >>
    > >>
    > >>>On Mon, 2003-11-17 at 10:21, Hubert Figuiere wrote:
    > >>>
    > >>>
    > >>>
    > >>>
    > >>>>According to msevior_at_physics.unimelb.edu.au <msevior_at_physics.unimelb.edu.au>:
    > >>>>
    > >>>>
    > >>>>
    > >>>>
    > >>>>
    > >>>>>Given that Hub is on the verge getting the OSX port usable, I think it
    > >>>>>makes sense for us to go for a fair bit of publicity on this release.
    > >>>>>
    > >>>>>
    > >>>>>
    > >>>>>
    > >>>>I never said that soon. I'm now at the stage I actually try to use it
    > >>>>for real work and find to much things to do for it to be really
    > >>>>usable. And the build system still does not a make a fink independant
    > >>>>binary...
    > >>>>So it not for public consumption.
    > >>>>
    > >>>>
    > >>>>
    > >>>>
    > >>>>
    > >>>OK fair enough. No OSX binaries for 2.1.0. That leaves Windows printing.
    > >>>Anyone got any clues on how to make it work?
    > >>>
    > >>>Martin
    > >>>
    > >>>
    > >>>
    > >>>
    > >>>
    > >>>
    > >>>
    > >>Not sure, but I'd just like to put in a plug here for fixing the
    > >>printing size in Stable. I had to invoke the unholy Office 97 cd the
    > >>other day for the rest of the family because they were sick of having to
    > >>edit in 2.0.1 and print in 1.99.6.
    > >>
    > >>For the 2.1.0 windows printing, if you're talking about the itsybitsy
    > >>print, it looks almost like it's printing dot for dot. On my
    > >>high-resolution laser, the letters are far smaller than on my inkjet.
    > >>Perhaps something isn't getting scaled?
    > >>
    > >>Wish I could be more help. If there's anything testing-wise you guys
    > >>need, just let me know. I'm brushing up on my programming so I can go
    > >>elbows-deep in the code, but for now I'm just a bug guy.
    > >>
    > >>
    > >>
    > >
    > >I didn't know there was a problem printing on Windows with 2.0.1. Can
    > >you point me at a bug in bugzilla?
    > >
    > >Martin
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >>Ryan
    > >>
    > >>
    > >>
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > Sure can. It's 6044.
    > http://bugzilla.abisource.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6044
    > It makes all the printed text smaller. If (for instance) I type
    > something in a 14 point font, then print, it looks like I typed it in 12
    > or smaller (just an estimate there). Of course, had I typed it in 12,
    > it would be smaller still on the printout.
    >
    > (Offhand note on my bug report: The order of the printout size there is
    > fairly accurate, though I think that I was incorrect in saying that the
    > 1.99.6 printout and display are the same size. That shouldn't make too
    > much of a difference, though. )
    >
    > Ryan

    -- 
    Marc Maurer <j.m.maurer_at_student.utwente.nl>
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Nov 17 2003 - 06:07:49 EST