Re: WinInet vs. libcurt (was Re: Prototype: AbiWord using libgsf)

From: Leonard Rosenthol (leonardr@lazerware.com)
Date: Mon Oct 27 2003 - 11:17:25 EST

  • Next message: ericzen: "Re: 2.0.1 release"

    At 4:46 PM +0100 10/27/03, Jordi Mas wrote:
    >> Actually, it doesn't. WinInet is fine for a "hack", but isn't
    >>usable for serious I/O - libcurl is MUCH more robust, flexible, and
    >>faster. (and it's xp - which means we don't have to waste time
    >>abstracting it).
    >
    >Is this a personal opinion or it is based on empirical facts?

            Personal experience and that of others I know doing Windows
    development.

    >I probably won't use wininet for a server application but it's more
    >than fine for a client application.
    >

            That's a good point - I am considering the server-side and
    the need for threading/reliability/etc....It may well do OK for
    client side.

            However, it is still not as complete as libcurl.

    Leonard

    -- 
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Leonard Rosenthol                            <mailto:leonardr@lazerware.com>
                          			     <http://www.lazerware.com>
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Oct 27 2003 - 11:18:42 EST