Re: commit (head): gr_Graphics

From: Dom Lachowicz (domlachowicz_at_yahoo.com)
Date: Wed Mar 17 2004 - 16:38:29 EST

Next message: Hubert Figuiere: "Re: commit (head): gr_Graphics"

Previous message: Tomas Frydrych: "commit (head): gr_Graphics"
In reply to: Tomas Frydrych: "commit (head): gr_Graphics"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> Please, from now on do not access any static
> functions inside
> GR_Graphics and GR_Win32Graphics by their fully
> qualified names. For
> example instead of calling XAP_App::getApp(), use
> getApp().

Why? IMO, XXX::getApp() should be removed. There is
only ever 1 instance of an XAP_Application object.
There should not be FV_View::getApp() or
GR_Graphics::getApp() methods.

Why/how would the graphics' application differ from
the program's app?

Dom

=====
I think the problem with the Democratic Party in general is that they've been so afraid to lose they're willing to say whatever it takes to win. And once you're willing to say whatever it takes to win, you lose. - Howard Dean

http://www.deanforamerica.com/

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam
http://mail.yahoo.com

Next message: Hubert Figuiere: "Re: commit (head): gr_Graphics"
Previous message: Tomas Frydrych: "commit (head): gr_Graphics"
In reply to: Tomas Frydrych: "commit (head): gr_Graphics"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Mar 17 2004 - 16:40:47 EST