Re: Branching off 2.2

From: J.M. Maurer <j.m.maurer_at_student.utwente.nl>
Date: Sat Jan 01 2005 - 22:54:42 CET

Op za, 01-01-2005 te 16:33 -0500, schreef Hubert Figuiere:
>
> > For example: there was a crash in stable that occured when you had a
> > selection, and switched views. This was fixed in HEAD by quite a but of
> > code reworking. This rework could not be done in STABLE, due to the size
> > of the patch and the accompanying API changes. Hence, STABLE was fixed
> > in a different way. You wouldn't want that fix to be merged into HEAD.
>
>
> But in that case, the code wouldn't no longer be there ? Then no merge
> to perform :-)

But it would give merge errors :-)

Marc
Received on Sat Jan 1 22:49:35 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Jan 01 2005 - 22:49:35 CET