Re: Countdown to branch?

>
>> > However if Marc is happy to be our prime back-porter and maintainer
>> for
>> > 2.2 I think we're in good shape to launch into 2.4 whenever he's happy
>> for
>> > that to happen.
>>
>> I think it might be a good idea for his non-abi-related issues to be to
>> the side first, or at least for him to be given a chance to contemplate
>> and respond at his leisure (this rash action business really gets me
>> blood boilin' mate (: ). I know I would appreciate that much.
>
> Getting a bit more time during the day, as the non-abi-relates issues
> are a bit calmed down a bit (for now).
>
> So, that gives me the time to maintain 2.2, which I plan to branch off
> soon then.
>
>> > My own preference is that we branch after 2.2.3 but I'll leave that to
>> the
>> > 2.2 maintainer.
>>
>> Sounds acceptable to me.
>
> And to me... Anyone against tagging 2.2.3 tomorrow, around 22:00 CET ? I
> know there are more bugs to be fixed, but we can do a 2.2.4, and 5 and 6
> as we please the comming weeks.
>
> Thanks for trusting me as the 2.2 maintainer,

Hi Marc,
        Thanks very much! I'm sure you'll do an excellent job. I would
like to have a couple of regressions fixed before 2.2.3. These
are:

8207 and 8248.

Neither look hard and should be fixed by tomorrow but sometimes these
things take longer than you think :-)

Cheers

Martin

> Marc
>
>
Received on Sun Jan 2 00:20:06 2005