Re: Countdown to branch?

From: J.M. Maurer <j.m.maurer_at_student.utwente.nl>
Date: Sat Jan 01 2005 - 22:44:29 CET

> > However if Marc is happy to be our prime back-porter and maintainer for
> > 2.2 I think we're in good shape to launch into 2.4 whenever he's happy for
> > that to happen.
>
> I think it might be a good idea for his non-abi-related issues to be to
> the side first, or at least for him to be given a chance to contemplate
> and respond at his leisure (this rash action business really gets me
> blood boilin' mate (: ). I know I would appreciate that much.

Getting a bit more time during the day, as the non-abi-relates issues
are a bit calmed down a bit (for now).

So, that gives me the time to maintain 2.2, which I plan to branch off
soon then.

> > My own preference is that we branch after 2.2.3 but I'll leave that to the
> > 2.2 maintainer.
>
> Sounds acceptable to me.

And to me... Anyone against tagging 2.2.3 tomorrow, around 22:00 CET ? I
know there are more bugs to be fixed, but we can do a 2.2.4, and 5 and 6
as we please the comming weeks.

Thanks for trusting me as the 2.2 maintainer,
  Marc
Received on Sat Jan 1 22:39:24 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Jan 01 2005 - 22:39:24 CET