On Wed, 2005-01-12 at 17:31 -0500, Hubert Figuiere wrote:
> Unit tests for ut_map.cpp, ut_set.cpp and ut_types.cpp
> (ut_map unit test is known to fail)
> CVS: Modified Files:
> CVS: src/af/util/xp/t/GNUmakefile.am
> CVS: Added Files:
> CVS: src/af/util/xp/t/ut_map.t.cpp src/af/util/xp/t/ut_set.t.cpp
> CVS: src/af/util/xp/t/ut_types.t.cpp
>
>
> UT_Map and UT_Set seems to be a good candidate for STLization
> That'll ditch UT_RBTree as well.
I seem to recall that we eventually might want to use th RBTree for our
PT... or does the STL contain a RBTree implementation as well ?
Marc
Received on Wed Jan 12 23:38:38 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jan 12 2005 - 23:38:38 CET