On Wed, 2005-01-12 at 23:38 +0100, J.M. Maurer wrote:
> > UT_Map and UT_Set seems to be a good candidate for STLization
> > That'll ditch UT_RBTree as well.
>
> I seem to recall that we eventually might want to use th RBTree for
> our
> PT... or does the STL contain a RBTree implementation as well ?
>
Then I'll keep that RBTree for now. But I doubt it gets used...
Hub
-- Crazy French - http://www.figuiere.net/hub/Received on Thu Jan 13 18:01:22 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jan 13 2005 - 18:01:24 CET