> On Fri, 2005-01-14 at 11:15 +1100, msevior@physics.unimelb.edu.au wrote:
>> OK I see what you're saying now.
>>
>> From my perspective this IS the way we allow cross platfrom out-of-mem
>> embedding of objects.
>>
>> The XP code is in place (well almost on my laptop now :-) to display
>> embedded content. We write plugins enable it.
>>
>> I'm not smart enough to come up with my own XP embedding framework. We
>> could steal Mozilla's or OOo's. Maybe we should have that discussion.
>>
>> I don't particularly like either myself.
>
> I was thinking of using XPLC (http://xplc.sf.net/) for the components,
> and for the APIs we need to syntesize what is being done with these
> frameworks and take what we want.
>
Hmm I don't see why this can't be a plugin too. If you like it, write a
bridge to support it. If everyone is blown away by it's usefulness it can
be incorporated into the main build.
Cheers
Martin
>
> Hub
> --
> Crazy French - http://www.figuiere.net/hub/
>
>
Received on Fri Jan 14 02:05:31 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jan 14 2005 - 02:05:31 CET