Re: Commit (HEAD): 8996, extension override for command line conversions

From: Dom Lachowicz <domlachowicz_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Tue Jun 07 2005 - 17:15:13 CEST

Tomas, I think that you're making a mountain out of a
molehill. This patch is at the *very* fringes of Abi,
self-contained, minimal, peer-reviewed (by me), and
fixes a bug/shortcoming in our cmdline converter. This
patch is polish for our cmdline conversion feature,
not a new feature in itself.

I appreciate the work you've been doing to get the 2.4
release out the door. Over the last few days, I've
tried to do my share to help out and hope to continue
to do so over the coming weeks.

Let's try to get a 2.3.1 release out soon so that we
can get some more feedback on how we're doing.
Gnumeric is trying to do a release every 2 weeks until
their 1.6.0 release. Maybe we should do the same.

Best,
Dom

--- Tomas Frydrych <tomasfrydrych@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

>
> Hi Sum1,
>
> > Just to clarify, I didn't approve the patch; I
> just committed it as a
> > favor.
>
> I know; it was not meant to be personal.
>
> > I do, however, find it strange that this commit
> got singled out
> > when there's been recent talk about merging Maemo
> code into the tree,
> > talk about adding an AbiWidget peer -- not to
> mention the AbiWidget work
> > itself -- GTK toolbar changes, main menu
> customization work, added
> > support for autopackage, etc. all after feature
> freeze.
> >
> > I realize that some of those (proposed) changes
> are fairly
> > self-contained, but all are enhancements and
> therefore probably should
> > not have been committed after mid-April.
>
> Quite so and it either needs to stop or the tree
> should be reopened and
> someone come up with a new timetable. The problem is
> that not every
> seems to grasp the significance of feature freeze in
> the release cycle,
> as if it was an unnecessary evil that can be quietly
> ignored or worked
> around. Either we are just hacking for personal
> individual pleasure, or
> we are collectively developing an application for
> the world out there; I
> was hoping we were doing the latter but I am not
> sure everyone sees it
> that way -- am I actually the only person who wants
> to see 2.4 released
> soon? Because if I am, I better stop wasting my
> time.
>
> > ... but if a revert is truly desired, I'll take
> care of it.
>
> No, I am not suggesting you revert it. We will do
> should it cause problems.
>
> Tomas
>
>
>
>
>
___________________________________________________________
>
> Yahoo! Messenger - NEW crystal clear PC to PC
> calling worldwide with voicemail
> http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
>
>

                
__________________________________
Discover Yahoo!
Stay in touch with email, IM, photo sharing and more. Check it out!
http://discover.yahoo.com/stayintouch.html
Received on Tue Jun 7 17:19:00 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jun 07 2005 - 17:19:01 CEST