Thanks Martin!
I have created a small update which changes the UT_Strings to UT_ByteBufs
as Hubert suggested. If anyone is interested, I can post it. It works Ok,
but it does make the code rather less readable and requires some
unpleasant casts. It seems that while UT_ByteBuf is a possible alternative
for UT_String in this case, it lacks the finesse of the string class.
Best wishes,
R.
Received on Thu Jun 9 07:10:49 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jun 09 2005 - 07:10:50 CEST