On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 06:08 +0100, Roland Kay wrote:
>
> Thanks Martin!
>
> I have created a small update which changes the UT_Strings to UT_ByteBufs
> as Hubert suggested. If anyone is interested, I can post it. It works Ok,
> but it does make the code rather less readable and requires some
> unpleasant casts. It seems that while UT_ByteBuf is a possible alternative
> for UT_String in this case, it lacks the finesse of the string class.
Roland,
feel free to post. As I might obsolete the class sometime, this would
avoid to have to fix this at that time.
Hub
-- Crazy French - http://www.figuiere.net/hub/Received on Thu Jun 9 22:49:32 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jun 09 2005 - 22:49:33 CEST