Re: warnings

From: Ryan Pavlik <abiryan_at_ryand.net>
Date: Tue Mar 22 2005 - 13:48:40 CET

Robert Staudinger wrote:

>On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 12:40:09 +0100, J.M. Maurer
><j.m.maurer@student.utwente.nl> wrote:
>
>
>>Op di, 22-03-2005 te 00:33 -0500, schreef Hubert Figuiere:
>>
>>
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>I would like to beg people to care about warning given by the compiler,
>>>mostly because they are just increasing. Warning are here to warn, so it
>>>is likely they should be eliminated. Guess what ? If it is not done,
>>>I'll do it myself, with the risk that it comes with....
>>>
>>>Squishing warnings is a first step to code quality.
>>>
>>>
>>I wouldn't be against -Werror
>>
>>
>
>More clueful people than me think it's not a good idea when targeting
>multiple compilers - which is what we do.
>http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2005-March/msg00069.html
>
>Cheers,
>- Rob
>
>
>
As long as release CVS doesn't do it, that mail appears to have no
problem with it.

-- 
Ryan Pavlik
--
"Forget injuries, never forget kindnesses."  --Confucius
Received on Tue Mar 22 13:49:43 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Mar 22 2005 - 13:49:43 CET