> I think that option 1 is the one that make most sense. At that point we
> shouldn't trying to waste time maintaining a port of obsolete OS. After
> all if they didn't upgrade their OS they don't need to upgrade their
> app... The man power on the non Linux version being the most rare
> resource it is actually best to concentrate on getting the most out, and
> at that point being Unicode is better.
Well, after talking to many of you it seems that everyone agrees on option 1.
Also, this option allows Ryan or other Win32 hacker to try to make work the
unicows support on top on the Unicode build.
My approach is: 2.6 is the last version with ANSI support and after that we
switch to the Unicode only version.
I will keep working locally on this and when it gets into a decent status I
will commit it CVS (probably after 2.6 is released).
My estimation is that this will take two months or so because I have to finish
the work and also convert that I have done from using tchar.h and tchar to
Unicode WCHAR and string functions (let's do it right if it is going to be
unicode only).
Regards
Jordi,
-- Jordi Mas i Hernāndez, HomePage http://www.softcatala.org/~jmas/ Bloc personal http://www.softcatala.org/~jmas/bloc/ Planeta Softcatalā: http://www.softcatala.org/planet/Received on Thu Apr 12 21:27:21 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Apr 12 2007 - 21:27:21 CEST