> > One question though: "no license", what does that mean? Is it perhaps
> > public domain? _no_ license scares me :)
>
> Sorry it's my misread, clearly I did not know what an MIT license
> looks like. So it is released under the MIT license, with the
> following addendum:
> "
> Any stylesheet derived from this Software that is publically
> distributed will be identified with a different name and the
> version strings in any derived Software will be changed so that
> no possibility of confusion between the derived package and this
> Software will exist.
> "
>
> Since I don't expect to make substantial changes to the stylesheet, it
> should not qualify for a derived work, right?
Probably not. And in any case it is best if your changes went
"upstream", so we never really have to deviate from the 'official'
releases.
Marc
Received on Mon Jul 14 15:47:15 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jul 14 2008 - 15:47:15 CEST