Re: Serious bug in 2.6 PangoGraphics

From: Robert Staudinger <robert.staudinger_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu Jun 19 2008 - 15:20:09 CEST

On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 2:29 AM, Martin Sevior <msevior@gmail.com> wrote:

[...]

> Hi Tomas,
> Yes this will use more more memory. At least 24 bytes
> per glyph as you say. The benchmark as to whether Rob succeeds will be
> whether he can avoid bugs 11664 and 11668 without the 1440 dpi
> reference font.

Hi Martin,

i am not convinced this is an appropriate metric, as the point has
been raised that the problem might be rooted in how zoom is handled in
the layout classes.

- Rob
Received on Thu Jun 19 15:20:44 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jun 19 2008 - 15:20:44 CEST