Re: Fw: version/specification of Ispell dictionaries

From: Robert Staudinger <robert.staudinger_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu Nov 20 2008 - 09:27:30 CET

On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 8:28 PM, J.M. Maurer <uwog@uwog.net> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 13:43 -0500, Dominic Lachowicz wrote:
>> > I think you forget that we don't support MySpell on Win32. We only
>> > support ispell atm.
>>
>> No, I haven't forgotten that. I'd like for us to start using Enchant
>> on Win32 - the sooner, the better. But I've been saying that for years
>> now. I'd argue that we've never truly "supported" Ispell. We're
>> capable of using a small, outdated subset of Ispell dictionaries whose
>> build options we've never documented. The fact that Ispell's file
>> format is so fragile is regrettable. I wrote Enchant because:
>>
>> 1) we don't support Ispell
>> 2) and the alternatives are better
>>
>> Besides, I included a link to the code that "documents" the Ispell
>> dictionary build options.
>
> For the record: I'm with you 100% that we should use enchant on win32.

Folks, we are already using it in trunk.

- Rob
Received on Thu Nov 20 09:27:47 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Nov 20 2008 - 09:27:47 CET