Re: 2.8 release tracking

On Sat, 2009-06-20 at 11:34 -0400, Andy Korvemaker wrote:
> Would this qualify?
> http://bugzilla.abisource.com/show_bug.cgi?id=10649
>
> Footnotes are basically useless on multipage documents due to improper
> page formatting. This drove me to OpenOffice for my academic papers.
>
> I just tested, and the problem still exists in 2.7.4.

IMO it would. Martin, could you have a look at it? Even worse: 2.7.5
keeps on layouting, and it never finishes.

  Marc

> Andy
>
> On Sat, 20 Jun 2009 02:33 -0400, "Hubert Figuiere" <hfiguiere@teaser.fr>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have created a meta bug for the 2.8 release tracker. This track
> > *blockers*. Blockers are goals set for the release.
> >
> > http://bugzilla.abisource.com/show_bug.cgi?id=12151
> >
> > Feel free to discuss or add bugs you think MUST be done for 2.8
> >
> > Qualifies:
> > -missing core things (like the annotation dialog on windows)
> > -serious regressions
> > -crashers in the new features
> > -some bug to insure gets triaged
> > -Maemo meta bug (one still to be done)
> > -JPEG support (bug #1349) - which despite being a feature, shouldn't be
> > long to implement as it is.
> >
> > The goal is not add work but more to make sure we don't lose things that
> > are essential.
> >
> > Hub
Received on Sat Jun 20 20:24:53 2009