Re: 2.8 release tracking

Will do!

Martin

On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 4:24 AM, J.M. Maurer<uwog@uwog.net> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2009-06-20 at 11:34 -0400, Andy Korvemaker wrote:
>> Would this qualify?
>> http://bugzilla.abisource.com/show_bug.cgi?id=10649
>>
>> Footnotes are basically useless on multipage documents due to improper
>> page formatting. This drove me to OpenOffice for my academic papers.
>>
>> I just tested, and the problem still exists in 2.7.4.
>
> IMO it would. Martin, could you have a look at it? Even worse: 2.7.5
> keeps on layouting, and it never finishes.
>
>  Marc
>
>> Andy
>>
>> On Sat, 20 Jun 2009 02:33 -0400, "Hubert Figuiere" <hfiguiere@teaser.fr>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I have created a meta bug for the 2.8 release tracker. This track
>> > *blockers*. Blockers are goals set for the release.
>> >
>> > http://bugzilla.abisource.com/show_bug.cgi?id=12151
>> >
>> > Feel free to discuss or add bugs you think MUST be done for 2.8
>> >
>> > Qualifies:
>> > -missing core things (like the annotation dialog on windows)
>> > -serious regressions
>> > -crashers in the new features
>> > -some bug to insure gets triaged
>> > -Maemo meta bug (one still to be done)
>> > -JPEG support (bug #1349) - which despite being a feature, shouldn't be
>> > long to implement as it is.
>> >
>> > The goal is not add work but more to make sure we don't lose things that
>> > are essential.
>> >
>> > Hub
>
>
Received on Sun Jun 21 02:39:15 2009