IMO we also want these kind of patches, so +1 for me.
Marc
On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 09:52 +0200, Ingo Brückl wrote:
> Hubert Figuière wrote on Mon, 02 Apr 2012 18:39:48 -0700:
>
> > On 01/04/12 07:42 AM, Ingo Brückl wrote:
> >> This seems common in all the other dialog files.
> >>
> >> Any objections or encouragement?
>
> > What's the rationale?
>
> Well, apparently constuctWindow is a typo, and we are using these types of
> function names I patched in all the other 33 dialogs. So it's a cosmetic code
> cleanup that harmonizes source files. Don't you think that's worth patching?
>
> Ingo
Received on Tue Apr 3 22:59:12 2012
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Apr 03 2012 - 22:59:12 CEST